Breaking News International Press — 11 Ottobre 2012
La CNN parla di brogli elettorali alle elezioni in Venezuela: Chavez pagliaccio e paese allo sbando

ABSTRACT THIS IS CUBA: Un articolo compare sulle pagine della CNN. E ci si rende conto che non è più la CNN di una volta, la testata giornalistica con la quale Ted Turner, il co-fondatore, aveva sino a qualche anno fà garantito informazione oggettiva.

Un articolo durissimo che parla di un “principino” pagliaccio, che ha vinto le elezioni ricorrendo alle intimidazioni e alle frodi, portando il Venezuela ad una decadenza senza precedenti.

UN articolo in cui l’autore del pezzo David Fraum,  si rivolge a Chavez in modo offensivo, attacca tutto il sistema, la macchina burocratica, la farsa delle elezioni, asserendo che dai poliziotti armanti, all’acquisto dei voti, alla corruzione, ai documenti falsi, tutto il voto è stato un bluff, con un presidente che ha giocato doppiamente sporco, realizzando prima delle elezioni delle opere sociali che sono state “mantenute” con le risorse petrolifere, ma facendo al contempo stesso precipitare il Paese in un vortice di indebitamento esasperante.

Costruire migliaia di case per i poveri e consegnarle gratuitamente, garantendo una dignità in grado di dare una opportunità d’integrazione pare essere così dannatamente sbagliato? La parte più dura arriva quando l’autore parla in prima persona e dice d’essersi recato nel 2010 in Venezuela, dipengendolo come gli inferni visti, tra cui Iraq ed Afghanistan.

Ricordando loro che Iran ed Afghanistan sono inferni designati da scelte politiche degli USA, da un Presidente che non si sà se sia stato eletto regolarmente, ma di certo con campagne elettorali che fanno del sistema politico statunitense uno specchietto per le allodole tra i meno democratici del mondo. 

Ecco l’articolo:

Chavez clown prince of a decaying society

Venezuela’s authoritarian president Hugo Chavez is a villain out of a Batman movie: buffoonish and sinister in equal measure.

Sunday’s vote result powerfully exposes both sides of his clown-prince system of rule.

Read more: Survivor and Venezuela’s long-serving president

For weeks before the vote, Chavez signaled a willingness to surrender power, should the result go against him. On Election Day itself, he gave the Venezuelan newspaper El Universal a quote indicating he foresaw the possibility of defeat.

“Let’s get ready to recognize the results, whatever they are,” he said..

And yet just a few hours later, Venezuela’s Election Agency showed Chavez winning massively, by nearly 10 percentage points. Is the result legitimate? That’s hard to say. Venezuela has not invited any international election observers since 2006 and anomalies have been observed in past votes, especially the 2004 referendum to recall Chavez from the presidency

Yet it should also be said: In Venezuela, the most important forms of vote fraud happen well before Election Day.

First, the Chavez regime systematically controls and manipulates the mass media, especially television. Francisco Toro, founder of the indispensable Caracas Chronicle blog writes in the New Republic:

“Three minutes per day per broadcast outlet. That’s how much advertising each candidate is allowed in Venezuela in the weeks leading up to a presidential election. That’s six 30-second spots, no more. To long-suffering TV watchers in U.S. battleground states, that must sound like paradise. There’s a catch, though. While each candidate’s campaign is allowed no more than three minutes, the government can run as many ‘institutional’ ads as it wants to promote its work. And in Chávez-era Venezuela, such ads are generally indistinguishable from the official campaign ads, down to using designed-to-look-alike logos.”

Apart from campaign ads, however, the president himself can commandeer as much TV time as he wishes, although in the case of the long-winded Chavez, such appearances may not be vote-winners. More relevant to the success of the president’s messaging is the regime’s habit of seizing TV stations that broadcast journalism of which the authorities disapprove.

Along with state media control goes massive government vote-buying.

The Los Angeles Times reports: “Chavez in recent months has solidified his support base with massive giveaway programs, including one that aims to build 200,000 housing units for Venezuela’s poor. Another, called Mi Casa Bien Equipada, or My Well-Equipped House, has donated Chinese-made household appliances to tens of thousands of poor families.”

The use of state oil funds for this kind of electioneering is driving Venezuela’s budget deficit for the year to the astounding level of 20% of GDP, an incredible figure for an oil-exporting economy at a time of very high oil prices. (Context: The U.S. budget deficits that have so alarmed people during the Obama years never reached as much as 9% of GDP.)

Venezuelan politics is distorted most of all by a pervasive mood of threat.

I visited Venezuela in 2010. My visit began with a briefing at the U.S. Embassy. “You’ve been to Afghanistan?” Yes. “You’ve been to Iraq?” Yes. “Well, congratulations. This is the most dangerous place you’ve ever been.”

Venezuala, with a population smaller than Canada’s, suffers more homicides than the United States. Robberies at gunpoint — “express kidnappings” as they are called — are regular occurrences in middle-class neighborhoods. And if middle-class neighborhoods evince any disaffection from the regime, they lose what little police protection they have, or even discover the police suddenly abetting and aiding the criminals that prey upon their community.

Property is seized. Businesses are arbitrarily nationalized. Conversations are eavesdropped upon. The Internet is policed, at least to the best of the (very limited) ability of Venezuela’s not very competent security forces.

Hugo Chavez has laid Venezuela’s economy to waste. One of the world’s great energy producers must turn its streetlamps off at night. One of the world’s wealthiest exporters cannot afford to import enough food. One of the world’s energy superpowers is seeing its production slowly dwindle away because of chronic under-investment in the oil fields and the loss of access to technology as foreign companies are harassed and expropriated.

Did Venezuela vote for more of the same? Chavez does have a militant populist constituency, and it’s not impossible that the final result does reflect what the voters actually did. But then, Vladimir Putin wins elections, too, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad won at least one. It is not elections alone that make a free society — and a free society is what Venezuela long ago ceased to be.


 Abbonati Gratuitamente

Articoli Recenti


Articolo scritto da:

L'autore, ama viaggiare, conoscere e condividere le mille e più sfaccettature della realtà. Racconto nella totale indipendenza, un mix di attualità, scienza, rispetto dell’ambiente, progresso e tradizioni. La mia penna va sempre e comunque per la propria strada.

(0) Readers Comments

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.